You are wrong about them not having skeptics on. They had one skeptic on there who tore up the ghost divas for having some flake in their group who molested kids. He had the court papers I saw them on his site. They didn’t deny it instead they defended the guy. Instead of agree that people should be given background checks before they can go into peoples homes they chose to support the creep (Reverend Robert Hunnicutt aka Bob who plead GUILTY of molesting his small daughter and spent a couple years in jail for it). I made a mental note to never let any of those people around my kids or my kids friends. My sons are both adults and love that paranormal junk. I will take strange entertainment over disgusting sicko any day of the week.

If you posted that sites images without their consent you may be setting yourself up for a lawsuit. We can post our opinions all we like, freedom of speech covers that. Use trademarked site material and logos you may find you barked up the wrong tree. Just a bit of advice. Great site you have here. Always interesting stuff to be found.

catering, in the media, to beliefs and superstitions simply for the almighty dollar (ratings/advertising/promotional revenue) is not a new thing. it’s a disgraceful thing, but not new.

at least we have the Science Channel and it was here before PTN. why haven’t THEY picked up skeptologists????

but then i woke up, and was sad.

if you’ve been to any of these shows’ internet discussion boards you’d see that a good many of them do. with unmitigated fervor.

poor sods.

That’s right, you could’ve asked Mark for proof, though the post would’ve looked weak.

“There is no reason to badmouth America or Fox in this blog, it is the non-sequitor.”

If it was a lame pot shot, I agree. If Mark has been around the world and really does see America as an exception, it’s a valid point that’s worth discussing.