<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Up, Up And Away</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skepticblog.org/2009/01/12/up-up-and-away/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skepticblog.org/2009/01/12/up-up-and-away/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Skeptologists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:42:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Mender</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2009/01/12/up-up-and-away/#comment-15172</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Mender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=878#comment-15172</guid>
		<description>It seems like business is still getting hit hard.  Is anybody seeing an upswing in their respective niches? Health reform seems like a mess. I generate long term care insurance leads and annuity leads for the insurance industry, but volume has been terrible in the last two months.  I am afraid the worst is yet to come, but maybe it is just my attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like business is still getting hit hard.  Is anybody seeing an upswing in their respective niches? Health reform seems like a mess. I generate long term care insurance leads and annuity leads for the insurance industry, but volume has been terrible in the last two months.  I am afraid the worst is yet to come, but maybe it is just my attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2009/01/12/up-up-and-away/#comment-2592</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=878#comment-2592</guid>
		<description>&quot;Just attach a large hydrogen balloon to your boat trailer.&quot;

Well... Ok, but this thing is getting so combersome that instead of buying a flying car, I might as well buy a helicopter and adapt it to freeway driving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just attach a large hydrogen balloon to your boat trailer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well&#8230; Ok, but this thing is getting so combersome that instead of buying a flying car, I might as well buy a helicopter and adapt it to freeway driving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llewelly</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2009/01/12/up-up-and-away/#comment-2568</link>
		<dc:creator>llewelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=878#comment-2568</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
I’ve figured out how I’d pull a flying car trailer with my boat, but how would I pull my boat trailer with a flying car?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Just attach a large hydrogen balloon to your boat trailer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
I’ve figured out how I’d pull a flying car trailer with my boat, but how would I pull my boat trailer with a flying car?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Just attach a large hydrogen balloon to your boat trailer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wrysmile</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2009/01/12/up-up-and-away/#comment-2567</link>
		<dc:creator>Wrysmile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=878#comment-2567</guid>
		<description>This is brilliant, a simple and effective flying car

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/video/2009/jan/14/parajet-skycar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is brilliant, a simple and effective flying car</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/video/2009/jan/14/parajet-skycar" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/video/2009/jan/14/parajet-skycar</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil's Advocate</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2009/01/12/up-up-and-away/#comment-2541</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil's Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=878#comment-2541</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve figured out how I&#039;d pull a flying car trailer with my boat, but how would I pull my boat trailer with a flying car?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve figured out how I&#8217;d pull a flying car trailer with my boat, but how would I pull my boat trailer with a flying car?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Severin</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2009/01/12/up-up-and-away/#comment-2536</link>
		<dc:creator>James Severin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=878#comment-2536</guid>
		<description>@ Scoops
I love the Arrested Development reference and I can never see a Segway again without thinking of Gob Bluth!!!

As for flying cars, I&#039;m against them.  I mean if we had cars that could fly then how special would Superman be then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Scoops<br />
I love the Arrested Development reference and I can never see a Segway again without thinking of Gob Bluth!!!</p>
<p>As for flying cars, I&#8217;m against them.  I mean if we had cars that could fly then how special would Superman be then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mastriani</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2009/01/12/up-up-and-away/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator>Mastriani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=878#comment-2524</guid>
		<description>Ludicrous.

Cost prohibitive, energy inefficient, and hominids have a rather nasty habit of insisting upon less than logical/rational actions.

Considering the fact that all of our energy processes are modes of extraction, this fanciful idea is nothing more than fantasy and fiction.

I agree with the author, except on the issue of &quot;hope&quot;.  There is no reason to believe our species is smart enough to overcome energy inefficiency, gravity, and friction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ludicrous.</p>
<p>Cost prohibitive, energy inefficient, and hominids have a rather nasty habit of insisting upon less than logical/rational actions.</p>
<p>Considering the fact that all of our energy processes are modes of extraction, this fanciful idea is nothing more than fantasy and fiction.</p>
<p>I agree with the author, except on the issue of &#8220;hope&#8221;.  There is no reason to believe our species is smart enough to overcome energy inefficiency, gravity, and friction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ejdalise</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2009/01/12/up-up-and-away/#comment-2519</link>
		<dc:creator>ejdalise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=878#comment-2519</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think a flying car will meet automotive crashworthiness requirements.  If it did, I don&#039;t think it would be able to fly (too much mass).  Now, you can get waivers for specialty automobiles, but then it will not be a mass-market item.

Also, I don&#039;t want flying cars over my house just as I don&#039;t like planes or helicopters over my house (unless very high up, and heading somewhere else fast - but definitively not commuters). 

And last but not least . . . transfer booths!  Much nicer than flying-anything, nearly instantaneous (at least here on Earth), and has the potential to be turned into a Xerox(TM) machine. I could use another me to go to work while I surf the net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think a flying car will meet automotive crashworthiness requirements.  If it did, I don&#8217;t think it would be able to fly (too much mass).  Now, you can get waivers for specialty automobiles, but then it will not be a mass-market item.</p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t want flying cars over my house just as I don&#8217;t like planes or helicopters over my house (unless very high up, and heading somewhere else fast &#8211; but definitively not commuters). </p>
<p>And last but not least . . . transfer booths!  Much nicer than flying-anything, nearly instantaneous (at least here on Earth), and has the potential to be turned into a Xerox(TM) machine. I could use another me to go to work while I surf the net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadScientist</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2009/01/12/up-up-and-away/#comment-2476</link>
		<dc:creator>MadScientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=878#comment-2476</guid>
		<description>Check this out:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7821979.stm


@Jose:

 There only ever was one &#039;Cannonball Run&#039; in Australia but during that run one car (I think it was a Mazda) hit a dip, got airborne, and hit a race marshall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this out:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7821979.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7821979.stm</a></p>
<p>@Jose:</p>
<p> There only ever was one &#8216;Cannonball Run&#8217; in Australia but during that run one car (I think it was a Mazda) hit a dip, got airborne, and hit a race marshall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose the Paranormal Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2009/01/12/up-up-and-away/#comment-2475</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose the Paranormal Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=878#comment-2475</guid>
		<description>Flying car? Bah! Obviously none of you were present when I drove my 71 Valiant Pacer (Dodge Dart) at top speed without seeing the dip in the road. I can tick &quot;flying car&quot; off of my TO-DO list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flying car? Bah! Obviously none of you were present when I drove my 71 Valiant Pacer (Dodge Dart) at top speed without seeing the dip in the road. I can tick &#8220;flying car&#8221; off of my TO-DO list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
