<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stanton Friedman Doesn&#8217;t Like Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skepticblog.org/2008/12/04/stanton-friedman-doesnt-like-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skepticblog.org/2008/12/04/stanton-friedman-doesnt-like-me/</link>
	<description>The official blog of the Skeptologists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 01:34:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshua</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2008/12/04/stanton-friedman-doesnt-like-me/#comment-25385</link>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 04:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=538#comment-25385</guid>
		<description>Its obvious to me that Stanton Friedman is more intelligent than any on this thread, especially going by all these childish replies, so it&#039;s no wonder he won&#039;t spare the time to debate you...and why should he? Your closed minds are already made up so what&#039;s the point?
If you and your little band of ignorants wish to remain in denial then by all means do so, but why attack someone&#039;s life work just because you have decided its wrong? Are you that desperate to make a name for yourselves by going after the big names? I don&#039;t see you attacking some lesser known ufologist.
Bottom line is, people with open minds are useful in that they keep us in check, keep us working hard to reach our goals...those with CLOSED MINDS are of no use to anyone...
Your kind claimed it was impossible to go to the moon, to travel at speeds over 25mph, to fly...etc, etc. 
Debate Stanton? He&#039;d wipe the floor with you. But you were right about one thing...you are a fart.
Oh-and ANNA...humans were certainly NOT behind it love, and if you believe that then you really are the biggest fool of all. And you say you have a PHD? In what I wonder...
So long dumb asses!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its obvious to me that Stanton Friedman is more intelligent than any on this thread, especially going by all these childish replies, so it&#8217;s no wonder he won&#8217;t spare the time to debate you&#8230;and why should he? Your closed minds are already made up so what&#8217;s the point?<br />
If you and your little band of ignorants wish to remain in denial then by all means do so, but why attack someone&#8217;s life work just because you have decided its wrong? Are you that desperate to make a name for yourselves by going after the big names? I don&#8217;t see you attacking some lesser known ufologist.<br />
Bottom line is, people with open minds are useful in that they keep us in check, keep us working hard to reach our goals&#8230;those with CLOSED MINDS are of no use to anyone&#8230;<br />
Your kind claimed it was impossible to go to the moon, to travel at speeds over 25mph, to fly&#8230;etc, etc.<br />
Debate Stanton? He&#8217;d wipe the floor with you. But you were right about one thing&#8230;you are a fart.<br />
Oh-and ANNA&#8230;humans were certainly NOT behind it love, and if you believe that then you really are the biggest fool of all. And you say you have a PHD? In what I wonder&#8230;<br />
So long dumb asses!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Dunning</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2008/12/04/stanton-friedman-doesnt-like-me/#comment-25273</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Dunning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 06:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=538#comment-25273</guid>
		<description>&quot;Cited research&quot;? Not sure what that means. If it means Betty Hill&#039;s delusional reports, then yes, you&#039;re right. Unless I&#039;m missing some of his other &quot;facts&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Cited research&#8221;? Not sure what that means. If it means Betty Hill&#8217;s delusional reports, then yes, you&#8217;re right. Unless I&#8217;m missing some of his other &#8220;facts&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Dunning</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2008/12/04/stanton-friedman-doesnt-like-me/#comment-25272</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Dunning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 06:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=538#comment-25272</guid>
		<description>Certainly that&#039;s not ALL you can say...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly that&#8217;s not ALL you can say&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2008/12/04/stanton-friedman-doesnt-like-me/#comment-25270</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 04:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=538#comment-25270</guid>
		<description>Stan&#039;s conclusions are based on cited research . Any criticisms should also be based on cited research. Let&#039;s compare facts not opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stan&#8217;s conclusions are based on cited research . Any criticisms should also be based on cited research. Let&#8217;s compare facts not opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim2x</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2008/12/04/stanton-friedman-doesnt-like-me/#comment-22087</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim2x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=538#comment-22087</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dunning, you’re stupid. That is all I can say. Friedman was right. Your assessment is filled with mistakes and misinformation that DID NOT originate with Stanton Friedman. You are an expert of nothing except lying and an ability to conduct no research before making your proclamations.&quot;

The story is a load of bull.  Give it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dunning, you’re stupid. That is all I can say. Friedman was right. Your assessment is filled with mistakes and misinformation that DID NOT originate with Stanton Friedman. You are an expert of nothing except lying and an ability to conduct no research before making your proclamations.&#8221;</p>
<p>The story is a load of bull.  Give it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2008/12/04/stanton-friedman-doesnt-like-me/#comment-17112</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=538#comment-17112</guid>
		<description>Dunning, you&#039;re stupid. That is all I can say. Friedman was right. Your assessment is filled with mistakes and misinformation that DID NOT originate with Stanton Friedman. You are an expert of nothing except lying and an ability to conduct no research before making your proclamations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dunning, you&#8217;re stupid. That is all I can say. Friedman was right. Your assessment is filled with mistakes and misinformation that DID NOT originate with Stanton Friedman. You are an expert of nothing except lying and an ability to conduct no research before making your proclamations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2008/12/04/stanton-friedman-doesnt-like-me/#comment-17078</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 09:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=538#comment-17078</guid>
		<description>PS the first sentence should read &quot;the George Noury &#039;Let&#039;s sow more mass insanity memes&#039; CTC show...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS the first sentence should read &#8220;the George Noury &#8216;Let&#8217;s sow more mass insanity memes&#8217; CTC show&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2008/12/04/stanton-friedman-doesnt-like-me/#comment-17077</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=538#comment-17077</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m listening to him now on the George Noury &quot;Let&#039;s so more mass insanity memes&quot;, and therein lies what;s really going on, and why these twits still ahve a voice. There may be alien intelligence likely in forms that we and certainly the very arrogant Friedman won&#039;t recognize. Certainly Roswell was a military exercise gone wrong, and therein lies the chortling value of the Friedman&#039;s of the world. I had extensive interviews with someone who was given the baton to continue this &quot;alien&quot; &quot;para&quot; work, decades ago, and fairly soon he was under threats as he blew the cover that HUMANS were behind it all. We ain&#039;t that dumb. This work is &quot;Para&quot; as in parasite on the minds of the gullible,. Pseudo intellectuals. Profiteering off the fact that most humans are superstitious beings with one foot in the Dark Ages. It&#039;s the CTC and Friedman wet dream that the world will devolve into chaos in 2012 with the aliens in charge.  I believe they think their UFO&#039;s will come down and praise them for being so smart and make them kings of the world. Those of us who actually have real PhD&#039;s and are certified in myriad forms of hypnotherapy and related mind investigative tools, have stated the Frank story is easily explained and eaily duplicated.  So sad. There&#039;s a sucker born every minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m listening to him now on the George Noury &#8220;Let&#8217;s so more mass insanity memes&#8221;, and therein lies what;s really going on, and why these twits still ahve a voice. There may be alien intelligence likely in forms that we and certainly the very arrogant Friedman won&#8217;t recognize. Certainly Roswell was a military exercise gone wrong, and therein lies the chortling value of the Friedman&#8217;s of the world. I had extensive interviews with someone who was given the baton to continue this &#8220;alien&#8221; &#8220;para&#8221; work, decades ago, and fairly soon he was under threats as he blew the cover that HUMANS were behind it all. We ain&#8217;t that dumb. This work is &#8220;Para&#8221; as in parasite on the minds of the gullible,. Pseudo intellectuals. Profiteering off the fact that most humans are superstitious beings with one foot in the Dark Ages. It&#8217;s the CTC and Friedman wet dream that the world will devolve into chaos in 2012 with the aliens in charge.  I believe they think their UFO&#8217;s will come down and praise them for being so smart and make them kings of the world. Those of us who actually have real PhD&#8217;s and are certified in myriad forms of hypnotherapy and related mind investigative tools, have stated the Frank story is easily explained and eaily duplicated.  So sad. There&#8217;s a sucker born every minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptoid</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2008/12/04/stanton-friedman-doesnt-like-me/#comment-16936</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=538#comment-16936</guid>
		<description>Why would Friedman waste his energy on you? He&#039;d easily roast you in a debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would Friedman waste his energy on you? He&#8217;d easily roast you in a debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killerstringz</title>
		<link>http://skepticblog.org/2008/12/04/stanton-friedman-doesnt-like-me/#comment-15712</link>
		<dc:creator>killerstringz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticblog.org/?p=538#comment-15712</guid>
		<description>Oh,just to point out to the ones making blanket statements about- if you are a skeptic you are this or if you are a believer you are that.
FYI,some skeptics are believers...making some believers...skeptics.
Just wanted to clear up some potential misunderstanding(bottom line..I don&#039;t want to be lumped in with 90% of the folks here that call themselves &quot;skeptics&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh,just to point out to the ones making blanket statements about- if you are a skeptic you are this or if you are a believer you are that.<br />
FYI,some skeptics are believers&#8230;making some believers&#8230;skeptics.<br />
Just wanted to clear up some potential misunderstanding(bottom line..I don&#8217;t want to be lumped in with 90% of the folks here that call themselves &#8220;skeptics&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
